Imagine a large corporation, employing
thousands of people. The corporation is
headed by a Managing Director, who is assisted by several Divisional Managers,
and so on, down the organisation structure.
There are millions of Shareholders, who attend a Shareholders General
Meeting regularly, listen to the report of the Managing Director on the state
of the company, then go off to discuss what they have heard with the media.
The individual Shareholders have a minimal
input into the operation of the corporation, and are subjected to the heavy
propaganda put out by the Public Relations organisation of the corporation,
which has many years of experience in manipulating the opinion of the
Shareholders and the public, and a long history of being the ‘only game in
town’ in respect of its product range.
Over the years, the corporation, which was
never really efficient or effective in its operations, but which had ridden on
the wave of its PR, became less efficient and less profitable (or more
expensive, depending on how you look at it!).
The Shareholders became restive, demanding that their interests be
better protected, and the customers started looking to other suppliers. The Managing Director and the Divisional
Managers denied any wrongdoing, repeating over and over that the problems had
been caused by the previous management, which had been ousted nearly twenty
years earlier. They instituted new
rules, preventing the workers in the company from talking to the Press, and the
PR Department went into high gear, calling on the names of heroes from the
company’s past, and providing a clear identification between them and the
current management. Still, the
incompetence and the corruption of the present management grew, becoming more visible
as Divisional Managers were found by the Press to have stolen from the company,
or to have managed their whole divisions so badly that they were in danger of
collapsing and brining the entire edifice down with them. Eventually, the Shareholders General Meeting
took place again, and, this time, the Shareholders felt that their interests
had been so badly mismanaged that they rolled up en masse to vote in a new
Managing Director and Board of Directors.
These people took their offices seriously, realising that they had no
right to the positions other than the rights given them by the Shareholders,
and they set to work, replacing the dishonest, the ineffective and the corrupt
members of the company. It required many
years of dedicated work to undo the errors of the past, to institute a training
program that enabled the new workers to become effective employees, to build
the capital of the company back to the point where it was no longer the ‘basket
case’ of its industry, to re-establish the trust of the lenders and the joint
venture partners in the honesty and integrity of the company and its top
management.
Does this story ring any bells?
The African National Congress was
established with honourable intentions.
It made a number of mistakes in its progress to maturity, including
allying itself with the Communists, which told a seductive story with the
purpose of gaining control of a potentially valuable piece of real estate. It came to power, not in a bloody revolution,
as it now increasingly claims, but in a controlled handover by a White majority
that no longer had a fear of domination by the Russian Communists, a government
that had committed acts of terror against its own citizens on a scale that made
the tyranny of Hitler seem almost insignificant. It took power in an atmosphere of confidence,
the people believing that the opportunity had now come to correct the many
errors made in the past.
It did not take long for the new Government
to realise that it had been handed a cornucopia of personal wealth. The top people set to work with a will, to
appropriate to themselves as much of the wealth of the country as they
could. This attitude spread rapidly down
the ranks, as numerous cadres were rewarded for their membership of the ANC,
the South African Communist Party and Cosatu by the means of cadre
deployment. The institutions that had
enabled the National Party, representing a very small proportion of the
citizens of the nation, to build a strong economy even in the face of world
disapproval, were dismantled or allowed to fall into disrepair under the
management of incompetent and dishonest people.
The economy started to crumble, first in less obvious, longer-term ways,
such as the health care system, where once-proud hospitals were stripped of
their capabilities to become ghosts of what they had once been and the training
of nurses was almost abandoned, the educational system, where an untried and
untested new system was introduced with disastrous results and where the
experienced teachers were retrenched to bring in new cadres who had little
understanding of education or management of an educational system, the Atomic
Energy Corporation, a world-class nuclear research establishment, where the
scientists were dismissed to go to Iran, North Korea and other potential danger
areas) and the assets were stripped and sold at give-away prices in order to
realise the commissions to cadres, Eskom, where the failure to understand the
necessity of maintenance and continued investment brought about a near-collapse
of the economy which is now in the process of correction with massive price
hikes that are resulting in the country losing its previous standing as a
favoured industrial investment location, in Spoornet, where the sale of
thousands of wagons as scrap steel (again to realise a commission to a cadre)
brought about a massive decline in the capability of the mining, forestry and
other industries to be competitive on an international scale, in the Police
Service, where crooked Commissioners were appointed in order to protect the top
politicians from investigation and the Crime Intelligence Service was turned
onto the political enemies of the elite, in the labour system, where the
demands of Cosatu have been allowed to run rampant, bringing practically all
sectors of the productive economy into a state of uncompetitiveness and forcing
unemployment to levels that exist only in declining Third World economies, in
the Department of Public Works, where the disease of corruption has become
endemic while the capability to perform the necessary works has dropped to an
all-time low, in the South African Revenue Services, where the morality now
appears to permit a system of demand, enforce and collect, even where the
demand has no basis in law, in the Department of Defence, where the military
capability of the country had declined to the point where it is only marginally
capable of undertaking a peace-keeping role in a foreign country, to the
Courts, where the case load has grown, in some cases, to over two years while
under-qualified and under-managed Judges sometimes fail to deliver their
judgements for many months, to the universities where law graduates are unable
to write, even to read, effectively. The
list goes on and on. Even within the
Party, allegations abound of purges of ‘elements opposed to the Leadership’,
and joint Press conferences of the top leadership are held to give the
impression that the Party enjoys internal unity! The same allegations are made of the South
African Communist Party, where branches are disbanded without clear and
credible reasons being given.
It is safe to say that South Africa ,
under the ruling Tri-Partite Alliance, is heading down the same road of
corruption, mismanagement and incompetence that led to the ruin of so many
other African countries. The only
question is whether the ‘Shareholders’ of the country, the voters, will see
past the smoke and mirrors that the ruling Party is putting up, and decide to
elect a new group of people to run the
country in the businesslike way it deserves.
In the same way as the Managing Director who fails to manage his company
must resign, so should the President, in the same way as the Directors fail to
perform their duties to protect the interests of the Shareholders resign, so
too should the Ministers resign.
If the ANC is to have any honour in the
future, the Party must now accept that it has failed to perform its duties over
the past eighteen years. It must accept
that lame excuses are no substitute for performance. It must accept that it has moved away from
being the Party of hope to being the Party of division, between the races, and
between the classes.
Finally, it must accept that it does not have the qualities that are needed to manage a sophisticated modern economy in a dynamic, non-racial world.
Nicole, you are spot on. I just find it quite difficult why so many people still do not see this.
ReplyDeleteIt is clear that cadres support each other on the basis of what and who they are and not what they do.
Rob Davies had a press conference yesterday where he stated that SA would be very careful in future with who they form treaties with. Is it coincidence that he mentions this just as they return from a trade agreement meeting with China? One cannot help but wonder who and where they have sold the people of SA down the river this time.
I truely believe that the ANC only took on democracy due to pressure from the West and if there were no treaties with the West back in 1994, they woudl have taken on Communism. Most SA don't understand what democracy means.
I look forward to reading more of your work in future.