Monday, 19 November 2012

The Motion of No Confidence and the ANC


 
The refusal of the ruling Party to allow the scheduling a Vote of No Confidence in the State President confirms a trend that has become glaringly obvious in the past year.  There can be no doubt that the bosses of the African National Congress and its partners have no intention of handing over their privileged position to any other Party, under almost any circumstances.  This trend is one that should set off alarm bells, not only amongst those in South Africa who hold democracy in its true meaning dear, but also amongst those people throughout the world who have been witnessing the descent of this African nation, started less than two decades ago as the Rainbow Nation, the nation that epitomized the hopes of the world that at least one African nation could break free of the shackles of corruption and the incompetence inherent in nepotism that has bedeviled almost every other African nation that has gained its ‘freedom from the colonial masters’. The claim by Gwede Mantashe that the question is not one of refusing to permit the vote, but rather of ‘programming’ that vote, is typical of the ANC’s tendency to mush any question into insensibility. 

There can be little doubt that the right to hold a vote to censure the State President is a matter of the gravest urgency and importance.  A vote of this nature that is passed by Parliament will result in the removal of the State President from that high office.  That is the clearest manifestation of the right of the people to hold those in high office accountable for their actions.  The refusal to permit such a vote at short notice is tantamount to an admission that it has a more than negligible prospect of being passed.  An immediate agreement by the ruling Party to such a vote would have shown the public that the ANC has confidence that the subject of the vote is without foundation.  A fumbling refusal to permit the vote is a clear statement of their lack of confidence, and should be seen as a clear cause for concern by the voting public.  Given the almost universal disapprobation of the thinking, non-ANC-leader public of the conduct of the State President, a man who, apart from Robert Mugabe, is probably the most heavily-criticised State Presidents of the recent past worldwide, it appears that the proposed vote, if it is secret, as it should be, has a real prospect of unseating Jacob Zuma.

And therein lies the problem.  The ANC and its partners have gone on record in the recent past to call on the public to take every step necessary to retain its hold on power, even to the extent of ‘giving up our lives’ if necessary.  That sort of call goes well beyond the boundaries of democracy in any definition of it, other than that given by such laughable republics as the ‘Democratic Republic’ of East Germany, a State that could by no stretch of the imagination be classed as democratic in any way.  They have taken steps to expand and reinforce their hold on the Army, a traditional means of retaining power when the vote goes the wrong way.  They are proposing to disarm the citizenry even further, by expanding the controls of Government over the security industry.  They have already taken steps to remove any form of threat of armed resistance by the citizens.  They have failed to adhere to the underlying principle in the Constitution that there shall be a neutral investigatory body capable of investigating the actions of men of power, and, apparently contrary to a Court Order, and certainly contrary to the wishes of the representatives of a large proportion of the voters, they have refused to hand over documents that might enable Parliament and the public to understand why criminal charges against the impending State President were withdrawn so precipitately.

It is clear to any thinking person that the dark clouds of despotism are gathering on the horizon.

It is rapidly becoming clear which way the ANC is taking the country.  It is rapidly becoming clearer that urgent action is required by all who love this new country of South Africa if they are to preserve what little good is left of the work of Nelson Mandela.

No comments:

Post a Comment