The
revelation from al Jazeera of the request by the United States for details of
the ownership of a cell phone number in South Africa to which numerous calls
were made over at least a three-month period by an Islamic terrorist
organisation comes at a time when rumours are rife that the South African
Government has permitted, if not encouraged, the use of one or more military
bases in the country for the training of Islamic terrorists. At the same time, the Government welcomed the
arrival of Leila Khalid, a convicted terrorist, to the country on a lecture
tour to whip up support against Israel, an event that comes at a time when the
relations between South Africa and Israel are at an all-time low, and
relationships with the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom,
all supporters of Israel, are entering a frosty zone, in comparison with the
extremely friendly and active improvement of relations with Russia and
China. In addition to that, the word on
the streets is that some five hundred thousand Pakistanis now have residence in
the country.
Most of
these are rumours, but, as the saying goes, there is no smoke without
fire. It is a remarkable turn of
events. The three countries on the South
African ‘Don’t Like’ list are the three that have provided by far the largest
foreign direct investment into South Africa in the past, and continue to do so
at present. They are also the economic
zones that represent by far the largest proportion of foreign trade, in
addition to being on the upward slope of the economic curve, whereas China is
stagnating and the Russian economy is on the downward curve. Pakistan and other Muslim countries are
hardly a footnote to the South African economy.
One may be pardoned in asking why the country has such a strong drive
towards these new friends.
The answer
appears to be that Russia and China were always large supporters of the ANC in
the days when that organisation was a bunch of terrorists against the country
that was trying to stave off Communism.
Becoming respectable Freedom Fighters has not changed the affiliations,
as was clearly seen in the offer by the ANC, probably represented by his good
friend Jacob Zuma, to Muammar Gadhafi, who provided large funding and other
support to the organisation, as well as to other terrorist organisations, at the
time of the Lockerbie bombing, and who was invited to stash the cash that he
stole from his own country in South Africa, to protect it from the zealous
fortune hunters who wanted it to be returned to its rightful owners, the Libyan
people.
The next
question that arises is why the West continues to pump money into South Africa,
when the facts of its orientation are clear.
If the fact of Apartheid (certainly an abhorrent system of Government,
which, remarkably, was substantially similar to many of the new laws in effect
in South Africa now, although the new laws do not have the underpinning of
religious faith that Apartheid had) was enough to warrant a withdrawal of
funding from South Africa in the days of the anti-Communist War / Freedom
Struggle, why is the clear support of countries and causes which are patently
anti-West not seen in a similar light?
Perhaps the Western economies are waiting for the collapse of the South
African economy, so that they can rush in and grab the mining bargains, in the
hope that the next Government will be more enlightened, more intelligent, or,
perhaps, simply more realistic. If that
is the case, they will have to join a long queue. A senior executive of an ANC investment
company, during a mildly-inebriated discussion on investment strategy in 1997,
told the writer that the ANC planned to manage the economy down, so that it
could move in and take control of the best assets before it set about the
recovery. It seems that they have been
remarkably effective in that, with all the economic and industrial pointers
heading firmly south. However,
enlightened observers will have extreme difficulty in believing that the success
is the result of intelligent design, rather than seer incompetence and
aggressive corruption. As the economy
stands, there is no J-Curve in sight.
No comments:
Post a Comment