The second part of my work life is devoted to writing
fiction. I have written over fifty books, all of them still selling well in
most of the major markets around the world. I have always read widely, since my
earliest years. Reading has given me a very large input of thoughts, ideas and
ways of looking at the world. Reading has enabled me to visit other people,
other places and other times, and to gain some understanding of what I am
witnessing. That has worked very well in my consultancy activities, in which I
am able to view the ways that numerous people in different places do the same
sort of work, to understand that each way is relevant to those particular people,
and to evaluate what is best and what less effective in achieving the
objective. The consultancy activity has exposed me to many people and the ways
they think, their personal viewpoints and experiences. I have found that everyone
has something interesting to tell, some fascinating insight into the everyday and
the unusual. This exposure has given me a vast pool of thoughts and ideas for
my novels, a pool that is constantly bubbling over. Unfortunately, my exposure
to other aspects of our world has made me uncomfortable with what we accept, which
we do simply because it is so. I believe that we each have an obligation to
understand our environment, not to accept what happens around us simply because
it is so. We were given brains with amazing capabilities, and it is a denial of
our Humanity not to use those capabilities.
Some of the more unsavory parts of the world that I have
come to understand relate to politics and to justice. It is no coincidence that
many politicians come from the fields of law and religion. Politicians,
particularly the less scrupulous of them, are willing to use both law and
religion to achieve their own selfish ends, in the knowledge that both fields
of learning are substantially closed to the layman. Law is a complex field of
study, and it has been manipulated by lawyers to ensure that the less
knowledgeable among us are more or less forced to accept what is foisted on us ‘because
we say so.’ Although the legal presumption is that every person in a society is
presumed to know every law and regulation to which he or she is subject and to
abide by them completely, that presumption is clearly a fiction. The number of
laws passed each year in most countries is so great that it is impossible for
even an expert lawyer to know the detail, so that the average Joe is forced to
rely on common sense, an extremely unreliable form of understanding, or on
rumor and bullet-point explanations of what the law says. That situation is
exacerbated by the fact that each law often delegates the duty of making
detailed regulations for the implementation and operation of the laws. Neither common
sense nor rumor can protect the layman from transgressing some law or other,
probably many times each year. The fact that we generally do not go broke
paying the fines or spend years in prison is more luck than good sense.
The other aspect of concern relates to the use of religion
by politicians, working on the innate respect each of us has for the
pronouncements of men of the cloth. In this way, the President of South Africa declared
before an election that his Party would stay in power until the second coming
of Christ, yet no-one stood up to denounce this abuse of religion. The same
President also informed the voters that, if they did not vote for his Party,
they would be punished by their ancestors! Virtually every leader of a nation
going to war claims that their cause has the backing of the Almighty, but who
stands up to question that? Virtually every dictator claims to have the backing
of the spirits for his cause, and almost every senior public representative
swears an Oath of Office in the name of God, before proceeding to violate that
oath at every turn. Has anyone ever been called to account for taking the name
of the Deity in vain?
In all of my books, I attempt to describe some of the things
I have learned in an entertaining and, hopefully, informative fashion. Although
I want my books to be enjoyed by my readers, I would like them to sit back
after reading and digest what they have read. I want their lives to be enriched
by my books beyond mere entertainment. I want them to have some new thought or
idea, some different set of experiences or exposure, to meditate on in the days
and weeks to come.
In my blog, the purpose is more immediate and relevant to a
particular situation. I live in South Africa, Germany, Britain and the United
States, depending on where my most time-consuming projects are, and I work
internationally, with fifteen countries hosting at least one major project. I
love each of the countries and the people in them. If you open yourself to
people, it is impossible not to like them. However, that does not blind me to
the shortcomings I see in them. No single country is perfect, although several
come as close to that state as may be possible in an imperfect world. In most cases,
the politicians work hard at increasing the imperfections, usually against the
real wishes of the citizens. The worst in this regard are the African
countries, where the tradition of real democracy is not yet sufficiently deeply
embedded for it to become an overriding consideration in the minds of the
citizens, most of whom have some tribal tradition in the backs of their minds.
Tribal rule is as far removed from true democracy as communism, and it is no
surprise that Marxist governments tend to promote tribal contrasts as a means
of entrenching their own ideas of a ‘democratic dictatorship’. Although few
African countries do not escape this categorization, the one that comes first
to mind is South Africa. It is a country that started, under difficult
conditions, to establish a democracy, faltering at first under the racist
thinking of Apartheid and then again under the dominant Marxist-Leninist
policies of the present Neo-Apartheid government of the ANC. In both cases, the
idea was to use the differences of the one group against the others as a lever
to divide and conquer. I suppose that, initially, the purpose was to obtain and
maintain political power, but, in both cases, that quickly degenerated to
become an outright kleptocracy, in which political power was used for
self-enrichment of those few in control. In both cases it was misguided at
best, and almost certainly criminal, yet the rest of the world allowed the
situation to develop to the point where the country was reduced to a shadow of what
it could have been. The people of the world also pay the price for this,
because your success indirectly is my success. The whole population of the
world is enriched if at least one part of it succeeds.
And that is part of the message of many of my blog articles.
If we work together to overcome criminality, prejudice and partisanship, we can
make the world a better place, a much better place for all of us.
I hope that my books and my blog will play a part in that. I
hope that, by giving you a view of the facts and of an alternative way of understanding
them, I can encourage each of you to take a step in the direction of a better
world for all of us.
I would love to hear from you. If you send an email to me at
NicoleAStuart@gmail.com, I will
send you a list of my books with a brief description of each, and notify you of
new books and blog articles as they are published. I will never use your email
address for any other purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment